J.B. Pritzker gave one other $7 million to his personal gubernatorial marketing campaign Friday.
Which, doing the maths, is roughly the equal of me spending $seven hundred on a plumber.
Besides it isn’t, my funds being much more near the bone than his. I miss $seven hundred greater than he misses $7 million.
We each get worth for our cash. I get a brand new boiler pump. And Pritzker airs TV commercials just like the one I noticed Monday night time, a poignant spot with melancholy piano music and J.B. speaking about his mom, who died of alcoholism. A medley of emotion, making an attempt to humanize the billionaire.
It really works. He comes off as very lifelike.
Which is greater than what could possibly be finished for Gov. Bruce Rauner, who couldn’t be rendered human if Leo Burnett and J. Walter Thompson rose up from the grave and gave him the top-to-toe buffing makeover that Dorothy Gale will get upon arrival on the Emerald Metropolis.
No, the difficulty is the entire notion of dueling tycoons.
The telephone rang. It was Dan Biss, who can also be operating for governor however with out advantage of an infinite geyser of cash fountaining over his head. We talked about nonpolitical issues — who does that? — and laughed, for therefore lengthy that I needed to lastly drop the trace: That is enjoyable however I’ve work to do. What precisely is in your thoughts?
The race, in fact.
“This has turn out to be a nationwide referendum on whether or not you possibly can run for workplace as a traditional individual in any respect,” he stated. “Within the period of Trump we’ve to determine should you can run for workplace should you’re not a billionaire. For those who can’t run until you’re financing your self, that’s terrifying for democracy.”
“Terrifying for Democracy” might be the heading for our period in future public faculty textbooks. Assuming, in fact, we’ve got public faculties. Or textbooks. Or a future.
I considered quibbling at Biss, together with his Harvard diploma and MIT doctorate, casting himself as a daily joe. However I assume on the Pritzker scale he’s.
We do appear to be at a watershed second in terms of our nation’s lengthy slide again into the Gilded Age, when the wealthy topped themselves in laurel branches and ate banquets on horseback whereas the poor bought matches on the street.
Right here’s the half I don’t perceive. You’d assume, being set for all times, with sufficient to endow a dozen generations, the wealthy would care concerning the world they’re abandoning. Care concerning the Earth, about our social framework, which begins to hole out if ninety nine % are in squirming distress. The Republican coverage now’s a recipe for the 1 %…